Optimizing MPD Performance in Highly Permeable Exploratory HPHT Reservoirs: Dealing with Human Factor and Technology Limitations
- Sunday Awe (The Shell Petroleum Development Company) | Ayodele Akinfolarin (The Shell Petroleum Development Company) | Adeyemi Olatunde Erinle (The Shell Petroleum Development Company) | Timothy Ibrahim (The Shell Petroleum Development Company)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE/IADC Managed Pressure Drilling and Underbalanced Operations Conference and Exhibition, 17-18 April, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2018. SPE/IADC Managed Pressure Drilling & Underbalanced Operations Conference & Exhibition
- MPD, Human Factors, Managed Pressure Drilling, Exploration, Technology
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 77 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
The management of human factor and the utilization of advanced Annular Pressure Monitoring (APM) tool enhanced the performance of Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) in a highly permeable and narrow margin high pressure (HP)exploration gas wells in the Niger Delta. The pore pressure prognosis (PPP) indicated narrow drilling window in the HP section which necessitated the deployment of MPD for safe project execution.
The MPD mud design entailed drilling with a mud weight that balanced the expected pore pressure prognosis (PPP) and the application of MPD surface back pressure (SBP) to balance the highest PPP case. During the drilling of the first of a three-well-campaign, a kick was taken with pore pressure equivalent to the highest predicted case. The evaluation of the pre-kick Equivalent Static Density (ESD) data indicated that the bottom hole pressure (BHP) was not maintained at the programmed set point unknown to the MPD operator. Transient dips in the BHP below the set point and pore pressure resulted to significant gas influx from the gas reservoir with permeability of 124 - 204mD and reservoir mobility of 112 – 1000mD/cp. Incident causal analysis revealed the contribution of human factor and limitations of conventional APM tool.
This paper details how human factor was effectively managed using procedures and training, and how the advanced APM tool enhanced MPD process optimization in the second deployment resulting in the achievement of BHP values within the range for safe drilling.
|File Size||880 KB||Number of Pages||9|