Recent Advancements in Far-Field Proppant Detection
- Terry Palisch (CARBO Ceramics) | Wadhah Al-Tailji (CARBO Ceramics) | Lew Bartel (CARBO Ceramics) | Chad Cannan (CARBO Ceramics) | Matt Czapski (ConocoPhillips) | Keith Lynch (ConocoPhillips)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, 9-11 February, The Woodlands, Texas, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2016. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.6.6 Directional Drilling, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 2.5 Hydraulic Fracturing, 3 Production and Well Operations, 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation, 5.7.2 Recovery Factors, 2 Well completion, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 5.7 Reserves Evaluation, 4.1 Processing Systems and Design, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant)
- Well Planning, Stimulation Design, Fracture Diagnostics, Proppant, Proppant Detection
- 4 in the last 30 days
- 1,325 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
The combination of multistage hydraulic fracture treatments with horizontal drilling technology has been the primary driver to the successful development of resource plays. More than 85% of wells drilled in North America today employ these methods. However, while these technologies have been wildly successful, only recently has the industry begun to address in earnest, the efficiency of current practices. These completion and development optimization efforts require an understanding of which portions of the reservoir have not been adequately contacted/stimulated and are thereby failing to contribute to production, and ultimate hydrocarbon recovery. Understanding where the proppant is located, both near- and far-field, is the starting point for these evaluations, and is the basis for this paper.
Traditional fracture mapping technologies provide indirect estimates of fluid distribution within the fracture network. However, there is little direct correlation between fluid distribution and proppant location, and since most unpropped portions of fractures rapidly collapse, identification of the proppant location better represents the region which contributes to ultimate recovery. Near-wellbore detection of proppant can provide insight into whether all perf clusters (in the case of plug and perf) have received proppant as well as the impacts of proppant overflush. Conversely, accurate determination of far-field proppant placement will affect everything from well and stage spacing, to stage design and refrac candidate selection, and allow significant optimization of diversion techniques. While knowledge of both near- and far-field proppant location is necessary for the industry to overcome the single-digit recovery factors that are now projected in many unconventional plays, far-field proppant detection techniques have been largely absent to date.
This paper briefly reviews the current "state of the industry" regarding near-wellbore proppant detection technology. It then presents a novel far-field proppant detection technique which utilizes electro-magnetic differencing and a specialty detectable proppant. This includes a description of the technology as well as the methodology of the technique. In addition, the paper reviews the design and results from a recent (first-ever) field deployment of this technology in a horizontal Permian Basin well. Visualization of the proppant in the far-field is also shown.
This paper should be beneficial to all engineers and technologists currently interested in evaluating completion efficiencies as well as fracture stimulation effectiveness. Understanding proppant location in both the near- and far-field regions has significant impact on well spacing, stage and perf cluster spacing, and ultimate recovery from stimulated horizontal wells.
|File Size||4 MB||Number of Pages||25|
Camesa. 2012. Technical Bulletin 014: Voltage and Current Ratings (February 2012), http://www.camesainc.com/Resource_/TechnicalReference/2375/Camesa_TechBulletin-014.pdf