Lithofacies Controls on Mechanical Properties and Brittleness in Qusaiba Shale, Rub’ Al-Khali Basin, Saudi Arabia
- Ayyaz Mustafa (King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals) | Abdulazeez Abdulraheem (King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals) | Mohamed Ibrahim Abouelresh (King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals) | Ali Sahin (King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals)
- Document ID
- International Petroleum Technology Conference
- International Petroleum Technology Conference, 26-28 March, Beijing, China
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. International Petroleum Technology Conference
- 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 0.2 Wellbore Design, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 5.8.2 Shale Gas, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 5.8 Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs, 0.2.2 Geomechanics
- UnconventionalÂ ShaleÂ Gas, IntegrationÂ ofÂ GeologyÂ andÂ GeomechanicsÂ , Â GeologicalÂ Characteristics & Mineralogy, GeomechanicalÂ Paremeters & Brittleness Index, Sweet Spots
- 4 in the last 30 days
- 192 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 7.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 23.00|
The lower Silurian Qusaiba Shale is one of the major source rocks for Paleozoic petroleum reservoirs in Saudi Arabia and is considered a potential shale gas resource. The study aims to evaluate the prospectivity and improve the production potential of Qusaiba shale by defining the lithofacies and mineralogy as controlling factors for brittleness and other mechanical parameters.
The continuous 30 feet subsurface cores and log data of Qusaiba Shale from Rub’ Al-Khali Basin were utilized for the study. Geological characteristics on the core were fully demonstrated in terms of size, mineralogy, color, primary structures and diagenetic features to identify lithofacies. In addition, 30 thin sections were used to study micro scale geological characteristics. The powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to determined the mineralogical compositions. Surface morphology visualization and elemental analysis were performed using the scanning electron microscope supplemented with energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS). Acoustic velocity measurements and compressive strength tests were performed on 15 core plugs (5 from each lithofacies).
Based on the above-mentioned analyses, three lithofacies were identified: (1) Micaceous laminated organic-rich mudstone facies (Lithofacies-I), (2) Laminated clay-rich mudstone facies (Lithofacies-II), and (3) Massive siliceous mudstone facies (Lithofacies-III). Mineralogical composition resulted in variable amounts of quartz ranging from 39 to 40, 45-55 and 60 to 78% for Lithofacies-I, II and III, respectively. Lithofacies-I having relatively lower quartz and higher clay percentage and total organic content (12% by volume) exhibited low stiffness. Mineralogy- and elastic parameters-based brittleness indices exhibited ductile behavior of this lithofacies. Lithofacies-II with relatively higher quartz (45 to 55%) and lower clay contents and TOC (3-5%) than Lithofacies-I resulted in relatively higher stiffness and brittleness. The brittleness index exhibited brittle behavior for silica rich Lithofacies-III (low TOC< 3%) as reflected by Young's modulus (average 32 GPa) and low Poisson's ratio (average 0.25). Hence, it is concluded that mineralogy and geological characteristics are the main controlling factors on mechanical properties and brittleness. The integration of three essential disciplines i.e. geology, mineralogy and geomechanics, plays the key role to better evaluate the production potential by highlighting the sweet spots within the heterogeneous shale gas reservoirs.
|File Size||3 MB||Number of Pages||20|
Buller, D., Hughes, S., Market, J. 2010. Petrophysical Evaluation for Enhancing Hydraulic Stimulation in Horizontal Shale Gas Wells. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Florence, Italy, 19–22 September. SPE-132990-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/132990-MS.
Grieser, B. and Bray, J. 2007. Identification of Production Potential in Unconventional Reservoirs. Production and Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 31 March–3 April. SPE-106623-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/106623-MS.
Jacobi, D.J., Breig, J.J., Kopal, M., Hursan, G., Mendez, F.E., Bliven, S., and Longe, J. 2008. Effective Geomechanical and Geochemical Characterisation of Shale Gas Reservoirs from the Wellbore Environment: Caney and the Woodford Shales. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 4-7 October, New Orleans, Louisiana. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 124231: 1–20.
Rickman, R., Mullen, M., Petre, E., Grieser, B., and Kudert, D. 2008. A Practical Use of Shale Petrophysics for Stimulation Design Optimization: All Shale Plays Are Not Clones of the Barnett Shale. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 115258: 1–11.