While at Texas A&M, he taught 97 courses and served on more than 175 graduate committees during his tenure. Holditch received several awards from Texas A&M. He was elected into the Petroleum Engineering Academy of Distinguished Graduates in 1998, named a Texas A&M Distinguished Alumni in 2014, and named to the Corps of Cadet’s Hall of Honor in 2016. An endowed chair was also created to honor him in 2012 by many of his former students, the Stephen A. Holditch ’69 Department Head Chair in Petroleum Engineering, which is currently held by Jeff Spath.
Holditch held various leadership positions in SPE, including vice president–finance, member of the Board of Directors from 1998-2003, and SPE president in 2002. He received numerous awards in recognition of his technical achievements and leadership. In 1995 he was elected to the National Academy of Engineering at the age of 49, and in 1997 he was inducted into the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences. He was elected as an SPE and AIME Honorary Member in 2006. He received some of SPE’s highest technical awards, including the Lester C. Uren Award, John Franklin Carll Award, and Anthony F. Lucas Medal. He published over 150 technical papers.
From 1999-2003, Holditch was a Schlumberger Fellow where he was a Production and Reservoir Engineering advisor to the top managers within Schlumberger. Holditch was President of S. A. Holditch & Associates, Inc. from 1977-99, a full service petroleum engineering consulting firm. His firm provided petroleum engineering technology involving the analysis of low permeability gas reservoirs and the design of hydraulic fracture treatments for various industrial and government clients. Holditch also has been a production engineer at Shell Oil Company in charge of workover design and well completions
Holditch received his B.S. in 1969, a M.S. in 1970 and Ph.D. in 1975 all in Petroleum Engineering from Texas A&M University.
Stephen A. Holditch, "Selection of Candidates", Tight Gas Reservoirs, Stephen A. Holditch, John Spivey, John Y. Wang
Download citation file:
Although the selection of the best wells to stimulate is difficult and time consuming, selecting the right candidate is important and can significantly increase the likelihood of success (Shelley 1999). The selection of candidates for well stimulation is a complex process that requires well-data gathering, data analysis, screening, and ranking of potential stimulation candidates (Hopkins and Hill 1994). Despite the complexities, the importance of choosing a proper stimulation candidate cannot be overemphasized. Designing a perfect treatment on a well that does not meet the criteria for stimulation wastes time and resources. Because various wells will be selected for different treatment methods, candidate selection also should be tailored to treatment type: A well selected for matrix acidizing might not be fit for proppant or acid fracturing, for example. In addition to minimizing failure rates, candidate selection is necessary in budget restrictions and mutually exclusive situations (Nnanna and Ajienka 2005).
Sign in
Personal Account
Advertisement
Advertisement
Related Articles
Advertisement