Abstract

Understanding the effects of CO2 exposure to the mechanical properties of a reservoir formation is critical in qualifying any CO2 storage candidate field. Two depleted clastic fields, D-Field and L-Field have been selected for evaluation for their CO2 storage potential. In this study, core samples from key reservoirs have been selected and their mechanical properties analyzed. Multi-stage triaxial tests were conducted on pristine samples classified as Pre- and Post-CO2 samples which have undergone 14 days of CO2 ageing with supercritical CO2 under reservoir conditions. The comparison of the results between the Pre- and Post-CO2 samples provides an understanding of the mechanical properties degradation observed on the samples which have been exposed to CO2. The results showed that both D-Field and L-Fields samples exhibited a general weakening trend observed between the Pre- and Post-CO2 samples comparison. However, D-Field exhibited higher magnitude of degradation compared to L-Field, as indicated from the reduction of Young’s Modulus (8 – 11% against 5%), unconfined compressive strength (20 – 34% against 0.3 – 4.5%) and cohesion (30 – 34% against 5.8 – 8%) between the Pre- and Post-CO2 samples. The lower magnitude of degradation observed in L-Field samples may indicates it as a more potentially viable storage candidate when compared to D-Field. However, the overall comparison of storage viability should also consider various other critical elements such as injectivity, storage capacity, seal capacity, leakage risks, etc., which are not deliberated in this laboratory study.

This content is only available via PDF.
You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.