Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
NARROW
Format
Subjects
Date
Availability
1-2 of 2
John Guthrie
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
Paper presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, August 25–27, 2014
Paper Number: URTEC-1922201-MS
Abstract
Summary Sappington Formation outcrops of the Central Montana Trough are being developed as a reservoir analog for the subsurface Bakken Formation of the Williston Basin. Correlations utilizing sequence stratigraphy, biostratigraphy (conodonts, palynomorphs, and acritarchs), and geochemistry link the two noncontiguous sections across the intervening Central Montana Arch where the section is not present. These correlations indicate that the variably sandy Middle Sappington siltstone succession (units 2, 3, 4 and 5) is directly comparable to the likewise sandy siltstones of the Middle Bakken. A similar succession of facies allows the complex lateral and vertical heterogeneity that characterizes the subsurface reservoir to be visualized and studied. Although not directly comparable, the overall similar depositional setting and generally similar facies also allows the analog to be extended to the upper parts of the Middle Bakken. Conversely, another key learning is that the Three Forks Formation underlying the Sappington is not a direct analog for the Three Forks reservoirs of the Williston Basin. Similarities extend however to the Saskatchewan part of the Williston Basin and the Alberta Bakken.
Proceedings Papers
Paper presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, August 12–14, 2013
Paper Number: URTEC-1579007-MS
Abstract
Summary Petrologic, geochemical, and scanning electron microscope (SEM) studies were undertaken on the Cretaceous Eagle Ford Formation in South Texas, to evaluate the nature and distribution of porosity as it bears on understanding hydrocarbon storage and producibility. Samples were analyzed from two cored wells at different levels of thermal maturity. One core is in the oil to condensate window (Ro ~1.2%) in the Eagle Ford and the second well, which is updip from the first well, is in the oil window (Ro ~0.7%). In both cores, samples were analyzed from similar lithologies including foraminiferal mudstones with high total organic carbon (TOC) contents (up to 8 wt%), deposited in the lowermost trangressive system tract (TST) or near maximum flooding surface (MFS) intervals, and limestones with relatively low TOC contents (< 1 to 6 wt%), interbedded with and deposited in the overlying high stand systems tract (HST) interval. In both wells, early diagenesis in mudstones resulted in precipitation of euhedral authigenic minerals (e.g., calcite, pyrite, kaolinite) that partially filled foraminifera fossils (intraparticle pores) as well as interparticle pores. Bitumen subsequently coated (i.e., post-dates) earlier-formed authigenic minerals. In the high maturity well, porosity (7 to 10%, with pores observed by SEM ranging in size from < 0.1 ???m to ~1 ???m across) is present in the bitumen (organic porosity), whereas no organic porosity was observed in the low maturity well. Focused ion beam-SEM (FIB-SEM) analysis of foraminiferal mudstones revealed low interconnectivity of organic porosity (permeability ~50 nD) in the high maturity well. Early diagenesis in the limestones resulted in recrystallization of biogenic material into microsparry calcite crystals, between which interparticle pores (<0.1 to ~1 ???m across) remain. Bitumen lined the walls of many interparticle pores and only locally fills others in the limestones. Compared to the mudstones, the porosity of limestones (6–7%) is slightly lower but permeability (up to 1000 nD) is greater. Furthermore, FIB-SEM analysis reveals much higher pore connectivity in the limestones than in the mudstones. Programmed pyrolysis analysis reveals a higher hydrocarbon yield in interbedded and HST limestones compared to TST/MFS foraminiferal mudstones, which indicates that there is better hydrocarbon storage in the limestones. The pyrolysis data corroborates the petrographic, SEM, and FIB-SEM data. Because bitumen hosts organic porosity only in the higher maturity well, the distribution of such porosity is directly linked to the post-depositional dispersal of bitumen and, subsequent higher levels of thermal maturity. However, HST limestones in the high maturity well contribute more to hydrocarbon producibility due to greater pore connectivity than underlying TST/MFS, TOC-rich mudstones with lower pore connectivity. URTeC 1579007