Effective propped fracture half-lengths following a typical hydraulic fracture stimulation of a wellbore can be difficult to quantify. Therefore, different techniques for modeling proppant distributions must be applied to the same dataset for validation purposes and to gain insight into the actual proppant distributions. A proppant-filled fracture model is applied to one well targeting the Evie Member of the Horn River Formation (British Columbia, Canada). Another technique for identifying microseismic signatures associated with the initial slickwater pad and the proppant-laden fluid was applied to the same well to obtain observed proppant distributions. The similarity of the proppant distributions from the two techniques gives validation to each procedure and the results can be used to optimize future completion techniques.
Skip Nav Destination
SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference
August 25–27, 2014
Denver, Colorado, USA
ISBN:
978-1-61399-360-6
Where Did The Proppant Go? Available to Purchase
Jonathan P. McKenna
Jonathan P. McKenna
MicroSeismic Inc.
Search for other works by this author on:
Paper presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA, August 2014.
Paper Number:
URTEC-1922843-MS
Published:
August 25 2014
Citation
McKenna, Jonathan P. "Where Did The Proppant Go?." Paper presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA, August 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2014-1922843
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Personal Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Pay-Per-View Access
$28.00
Advertisement
24
Views
Advertisement
Suggested Reading
Advertisement