Coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs are a growing source of relatively clean energy in many parts of the world. CBM reservoirs are fundamentally different from traditional hydrocarbon reservoirs. Gas is adsorbed on the surface of the coal cleats and not stored in pores. Still, estimation of the permeability of the coal cleats is important in judging the potential producibility of a given coal seam.

Traditionally, CBM reservoirs are surface tested using injection or production techniques to access reservoir permeability (Clarkson and Bustin 2011). Recently, pressure buildup and falloff tests using the straddle packer module of a wireline formation tester have been used in CBM reservoirs to assess reservoir permeability successfully. However, low permeability, limited station time, or both have, in some cases, reduced the quality of the interpretation results.

Deconvolution techniques have been available for some time; however, few practical examples are available in the literature. The use of deconvolution will generally allow extracting more of the same data. The derivative response uncertainty is normally due to errors in estimating the reservoir pressure and the flow rate. Generally, wireline formation testers provide reliable measurements of the reservoir pressure and flow rate.

We applied deconvolution to pressure buildup and falloff for the first time on data acquired in a CBM environment with a straddle packer. The use of deconvolution has improved the permeability estimation from the different tests. We were also able to identify the limitations of the technique and the uncertainties in the analysis results.

You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.