It is recognised that depositional and tectonic processes can result in anisotropy in horizontal permeability. Previous authors have described inter well interference tests which can be used to determine the magnitude and direction of permeability anisotropy.

Earlougher describes the elliptical flow regime resulting from anisotropic permeability. He suggests that it is impossible to recognise anisotropy from a single well test as the pressure response curve is the same as for isotropic reservoirs. This is thought to be valid when the anisotropy occurs as a result of very small scale permeability variations.

The authors have observed that interpretations of welltests conducted on certain formations in the North Sea yield negative skins. The common feature of these formations is that they are prone to anisotropy.

This paper describes the flow regime resulting from large scale anisotropy. The reservoir modelled is assumed to contain a regular series of parallel partial baffles in an isotropic permeability field. Conventional radial flow is followed by an elliptical pseudo radial flow regime, akin to that described by Earlougher. In certain types of anisotropic formation, the skin associated with this flow regime is negative.

A new family of dimensionless type curves is presented which can be used to quantify permeability anisotropy from the pressure response at the disturbing well only. The type curves have been generated numerically but limiting cases have been compared with available analytical solutions to confirm accuracy. The effects of wellbore storage and producing time on pressure response are also considered. Pressure responses are observed to be similar to those from other lateral hetrogenieties. This lack of unique model reinforces the need to interface with other disciplines in well test interpretation.

Field and synthetic examples are used to illustrate use of these type curves.

You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.