Abstract
Torque and drag models estimate downhole forces, torques and moments acting in wellbores and drillstring elements during drilling and completion operations. A comparison was made between soft string and stiff string torque and drag model using conventional survey data. Survey data needed for torque and drag modeling are provided by field surveys. Field survey can be conventional survey or continuous survey. Conventional survey is carried out every 90 to 100ft interval or more and only gives a partial representation of the actual wellpath, micro-doglegs and micro-tortuosities may not be fully captured with this survey. Continuous survey is carried out between 1 to 5ft intervals of the wellbore using high resolution survey tools and captures more the micro-doglegs and micro-tortuosities but more expensive than the conventional survey. Torque and drag simulations were performed using both Soft and Stiff String models for comparison using a novel software package. Data provided includes deviational survey data from conventional survey, drillstring/BHA data, and fluid rheological data. The torque and drag simulation produced results for hook loads and buckling while running-in-hole (RIH) and pulling-out-of-hole (POOH). Results from this study show that prior to buckling, results from soft string and stiff string model are almost identical with minimal differences within the range of 0.8% to 1.6% and these were achieved as open-hole friction factors (CHFF) from 0.1 to 0.25. High buckling risk was detected for OHFF of 0.3. When buckling occurs, the differences in results between the two models become very apparent. This paper showed that in order to use stiff string torque and drag model for a more realistic, representative and more accurate pre-buckling and post-buckling operations in a highly deviated well, a high resolution continuous survey is needed; this will capture more readily, the micro-doglegs and micro-tortuosities in the wellbore paths.
