Abstract
Geoscientists and reservoir engineers are very well acquainted with the terms "net-to-gross (NTG)" and "petrophysical cut-offs" or just "cut-offs". The significance of these terms is ultimately to define productive zones in the reservoir for hydrocarbon exploitation. However, there has been marked misunderstanding surrounding the usage of the term, net-to-gross and implicitly, the derivation of cut-offs which are limiting values used in expressing the net-to-gross ratio. While the geologist may be concerned with the pay for evaluating hydrocarbon-in-place and the ultimately the estimation of economically producible reserves, the simulation engineer is more concerned with fluid flow for pressure support in the reservoir1 .
The significance of this paper is to consider the different cut-offs selection methods, the varying interpretation of net-to-gross ratios and the implications inherent in such methods. A case study from a field in the Niger Delta is also carried out to reveal the impact of such selection criteria especially in rocks with congenital weak hydraulic properties which cannot be excluded at geologic correlation stage2 . The effect of cut-off parameters on oil-initially-in-place (OIIP) calculation was also investigated and a sensitivity analysis carried out on the petrophysical parameters to reveal the impact of the dynamically conditioned cut-offs selection on the petrofacies. Multiple Monte Carlo realizations were also employed to obtain probabilistic OIIP estimates rather than a single deterministic result.
