The production of oil and gas, and the various processes required to make these products suitable for transportation, is an energy-intensive operation. Provision of electrical power, process heat and mechanical power usually requires the combustion of fossil fuels with resultant CO2 emissions to atmosphere. Flaring of hydrocarbon-based waste gases also creates additional CO2 emissions at production facilities.

In many instances, taking a more global approach to facility design can greatly improve energy efficiency and hence reduce CO2 emissions. Employing Cogeneration technologies to generate both power and heat, or to recover waste heat from processes to generate electricity, can both reduce site emissions and help ensure security of electricity supply. It may also be possible to use waste-gas streams as a fuel for a Cogeneration plant, reducing the amount of premium fuel required and simultaneously eliminating gas flaring, or to sell any surplus electricity generated, turning a waste into a potential revenue stream.

There are numerous ways to configure a Cogeneration plant, depending on the ratio between the power and the heat required by the facility, the available fuels or waste heat sources, the form of process heat required and the actual electrical power demand. This paper will examine some of the different well-proven potential Cogeneration configurations based on Gas Turbines, Steam Turbines and Gas Engines, as well as looking at how the newer technologies of Organic Rankine Cycles and Concentrated Solar Power can be employed in Cogeneration applications.

With potential overall fuel efficiencies in excess of 75%, Cogeneration can offer significant CO2 reduction over separate generation of power and heat, from either an on-site or off-site facility, or imported power from a remote third-party power plant. The paper will discuss potential CO2 savings for certain common plant configurations and fuels.

You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.