Abstract

A numerical, coupled reservoir flow and geomechanics model has been built using a black-oil simulator and evaluated for diagnostic fracture injection test (DFITs) in unconventional reservoirs. DFITs have evolved into a commonly used technique to generate direct estimates of some key unconventional reservoir characteristics. Challenges, however, arise due to the complexity of the unconventional reservoir characteristics, long shut-in times to reach the closure pressure, and the long test durations to obtain realistic reservoir parameters from pseudoradial flow. One way to improve the analysis of minifrac tests in unconventional reservoirs is to use a coupled geomechanics and flow simulator, which is capable of representing the interactions between the reservoir fractures and minifrac developed during minifrac tests.

The numerical model used in this work is based on coupling the geomechanical rock properties with the reservoir flow model. The geomechanical model simulates the growth and subsequent closure of the hydraulic and secondary fractures by modeling the change in the reservoir stresses. Furthermore, the model simulates the minifrac pressure response before fracture-closure as well as during the after-closure falloff period. The pressure response during the falloff period is then analyzed to evaluate the reservoir properties using Nolte pre-closure and after-closure analysis techniques.

The coupled geomechanics and flow simulation of minifrac provides the capability of modeling the fracture breakdown and fracture closure and estimating the fracture dimensions. The traditional fracture design tools provide similar information focusing only on the geomechanics of the rock and ignoring the effect of the reservoir flow. An additional advantage of the simulator used in this work is to provide estimates of fracture stiffness, fracture closure permeability, residual permeability, and permeability of the matrix.

The simulator allows pressure matching and successfully simulates the reservoir flow for extended shut-in periods. The simulator allows designing DFITs with different injection volumes, rates, and shut-in periods and thus helps provide the optimum parameters for the test. The after-shut-in flow regimes generated by the simulation model agree with the DFIT theory.

You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.