This thesis presents a cost-of-energy (COE) analysis comparing three types of floating wind turbine platforms—spar-buoy, semi-submersible, and tension-leg platform (TLP)— based on existing commercial designs. The analysis develops the COE of a 500-MW reference wind plant at a reference offshore location using a merit-based criterion that integrates both lifecycle cost and turbine energy production. A sensitivity study examines how fluctuations in site-dependent operating parameters and fabrication cost factors affect results. The analysis demonstrates that while the COE of a floating wind plant can vary across a wide range ($0.10 to $0.22/kWh), the relative COE performance of the three platforms does not change. The TLP consistently enables the lowest COE across a range of operating parameters as a result of its comparatively low steel weight and less expensive mooring and anchoring system. The percent differences between the COE enabled by the TLP and that of the spar-buoy and semi-submersible are 4% and 19%, respectively, at the baseline reference site.
Skip Nav Destination
A Comparative Cost Analysis of Floating Wind Turbine Platforms Available to Purchase
Paper presented at the SNAME Maritime Convention, Bellevue, Washington, USA, November 2013.
Paper Number:
SNAME-SMC-2013-S05
Published:
November 08 2013
Citation
Dwyer, Daniel A., and Justin C. Emmerik. "A Comparative Cost Analysis of Floating Wind Turbine Platforms." Paper presented at the SNAME Maritime Convention, Bellevue, Washington, USA, November 2013. doi: https://doi.org/10.5957/SMC-2013-S05
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Personal Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Pay-Per-View Access
$35.00
Advertisement
33
Views
Advertisement
Suggested Reading
Advertisement