In May, 2010 Hess acquired its first microseismic survey in the Beaver Lodge area, North Dakota, over a 2-day time period. In conjunction with this project Hess also acquired a walk-around, offset, and zero-offset VSP to enable estimation of azimuthal anisotropy and generation of a 3D velocity model for proper microseismic event placement. Three different companies were contracted to process the data resulting in widely varying microseismic locations. Rather than accepting externally processed microseismic events that show completely different fracture geometries, Hess is developing an internal methodology to review event picking, 3D velocities, and survey geometries that will lead to dependable results. This presentation will discuss general processing methodology differences and acquisition problems that may have contributed to the inconsistencies. Integrating surface and pumping data with the microseismic reveals that incorporating a 3D anisotropic velocity model produces more reliable results.
Skip Nav Destination
Comparison of Microseismic Results From the Bakken Formation Processed By Three Different Companies: Integration With Surface Seismic And Pumping Data
Paper presented at the 2011 SEG Annual Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, September 2011.
Paper Number:
SEG-2011-1468
Published:
September 18 2011
Citation
Hayles, Kristin, Horine, Robert L., Checkles, Steve, and J.P. Blangy. "Comparison of Microseismic Results From the Bakken Formation Processed By Three Different Companies: Integration With Surface Seismic And Pumping Data." Paper presented at the 2011 SEG Annual Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, September 2011.
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Personal Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Pay-Per-View Access
$9.00
Advertisement
10
Views
Advertisement
Suggested Reading
Advertisement