ABSTRACT

From a physics point of view Crosswell electromagnetic (EM) is a natural extension of the single well induction logging method, whereby the transmitter and receiver are located in separate wells. However, the data processing required to produce an image of inter-well resistivity is significantly different than standard induction log processing, involving integration of multiple data sets to reduce the non-uniqueness of the EM inversion problem. Additional multi-scale data assimilation is required to extend the interpretation process away from that of a 2D or 3D resistivity model to parameters of more interest to a reservoir engineer, such as map-estimates of water saturation. After a brief description of the measurement as well as an assessment of resolution provided by the cross-well data alone, a description of the processing flow is provided highlighting how different data sets are employed to reduce non-uniqueness provided by the combined data acquisition/inversion process, and ultimately yield a higher resolution image of resistivity. Next, ideas for employing additional data to yield maps/cross-sections of parameters that are more important to reservoir managers such as water saturation are suggested. The benefit of employing a priori data to construct geologically reasonable starting models will be demonstrated on a data set collected at the University of Texas'' Bureau of Economic Geology Devine Test Site.

This content is only available via PDF.
You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.