Well interference directly impacts well spacing optimization and well economics, thus it has received significant attention. Observed in many unconventional reservoirs, well interference is mainly attributed to connection of hydraulic fractures. Few studies have compared the hydraulic fracture connection during stimulation with that during the production period. This study connects these two aspects by leveraging the low-frequency distributed acoustic sensing (LF-DAS) signals acquired during the stimulation and the daily production data of 23 horizontal wells in the Denver-Julesburg (DJ) Basin. Strong cross-formation communication between Niobrara and Codell has been identified from both LF-DAS and production data. Interwell fracture connection could divert up to 80% of a shut-in well’s production to the offset well in the adjacent formation, revealing that well interference can be evaluated through random shut-ins of wells during production. Further, fracture connection in LF-DAS data is observed between Codell wells but rarely between Niobrara wells. Given the average Codell well spacing of 1,270 ft and Niobrara well spacing of 650 ft, we observe that the half-length of the stimulated hydraulic fractures in Codell wells is significantly longer than that of Niobrara wells. This study also confirms that stronger well interference during production correlates with strong fracture connection identified from LF-DAS.

Keywords:
production logging, production monitoring, water fracture, complex reservoir, reservoir surveillance, upstream oil & gas, production control, hydraulic fracturing, lf-da signal, seg unconventional resource technology conference
Subjects:
Drillstem/well testing, Formation Evaluation & Management, Hydraulic Fracturing, Naturally-fractured reservoirs, Production logging, Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs, Well & Reservoir Surveillance and Monitoring
Copyright © 2022 Society of Petroleum Engineers
You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.