A comparative laboratory analysis of dry forward combustion has beenaccomplished with the application of different well configurations in a 3-Dsemi scaled model using medium and low gravity crudes. The model representsone-fourth of a five spot pattern in Raman and B.Kozluca fields, both of whichare located in Turkey. The model has been scaled almost fully commensurate with Raman field whilst, it merely corresponds to a geometrically similar prototypein B Kozluca field.

Seven experiments using Raman crude (18.3 °API) and four experiments using B.Kozluca (12.4 °API), have been carried out in the laboratory with a 40 cmsquare 3-D model having a thickness of 15 cm. Five different wellconfigurations have been applied to recover Raman crude while four differentwell configurations are studied with B.Kozluca crude. The model is packed bytamping a sand mixture of crushed limestone, water and crude oil. A total of 36thermocouples have been aligned at the top, centre and bottom planes toconceive 3-D temperature distribution and to track down the trailing frontduring the experiments. An ignitor is placed near the vertical injector. Air isinjected through this vertical injector in each experiment ensuing a period ofpre-heating and ignition to sustain combustion. To perceive their effects onoil recovery and process variables, all of the well configurations have beenstudied using both crudes except dual horizontal producers; which have onlybeen experimented with Raman crude.

Apart from the dual horizontal producers; horizontal producers positioned atthe boundary of the model alone as a single producer, a mass highest amount ofoil regardless of its API gravity. With a same burned volume more oil isrecovered by horizontal producers than by vertical producers. Nevertheless, inall the cases recovery decreases with a decrease in API gravity. Airrequirement and fuel consumption have been reduced greatly by applyinghorizontal producer. But for a certain well configuration air requirement andfuel consumption have been higher with lower gravity (12.4 °API) crude. Theprocess variables such as front velocity, fuel consumption rate, injection andproduction pressures and sweep efficiencies have been investigated for both thecrudes to assay process performance.

You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.