This paper deals with a fully implicit finite difference scheme for the numerical solution of the Lagrangian form of the porous media fractional flow equation. It covers the theoretical background, description of mathematical formulations, basic assumptions in the models, normalization and transformation between Lagrangian and Eulerian formulations, specification of boundary conditions, discretization and solution method. Some numerical examples are described and the results compared favourably with cocurrent immiscible displacement data. The Lagrangian formalism eliminates the need for space discretization thereby reducing computation time and error. Due to ease of formulation and use, the simulation algorithm presented can be used to formulate laboratory numerical simulators that can be used routinely for cocurrent flow numerical studies.
An equation of the form: Equation (1) (Available in full paper) is one of the various Lagrangian forms of the fractional flow equation for two-phase, immiscible displacement in porous media. It is Lagrangian because this configuration allows the equation to be solved as a function of saturation and time.
The Eulerian configuration enables the equation to be solved as a function of space and time. Bentsen (1) first derived Equation (1), also called the Bentsen equation (2,3)as subsequently re-derived by Shen and Ruth(2,3) using a different derivation approach. The equation was derived by combining Darcy's equation for two-phase flow with the continuity equation and by transforming the resulting fractional flow Eulerian form to Lagrangian form. A summary of this derivation is presented later in the paper. This equation together with normalized forms of the displacement (frontal advance) equation can be solved to produce a numerical description of a two-phase, incompressible, immiscible displacement process in porous media. The main aim of using the Lagrangian approaches is to enable a more computationally efficient scheme and eliminate the need for space discretization as distance is eliminated from the resulting equation. The form presented in Equation (1) is particularly useful because it is very compact.
Douglas et al. (4) presented an Eulerian technique for solving linear water flooding problems, which involved using a transformed saturation variable and the use of a small mobile 2 water saturation ahead of the flood front to enable the base of the floodfront to move forward. Fayers and Sheldon (5) obtained solutions to the one-dimensional displacement equation using both the Lagrangian and the Eulerian approaches. McEwen (6) used the method of characteristics for numerical solution of the linear displacement equation with capillary pressure. Hovanessian and Fayers (7) also solved numerically the equations describing waterflooding experiments that include both gravity and capillary effects. Their method is similar to that of Douglas et al. (4) because it involves the use of the Eulerian form of the fractional flow equation and the transformation of the resulting second-order nonlinear partial differential equations. Hovanessian and Fayers. (7) solution differs from those of Douglas et al.(4) because it includes the effect of gravity, allows calculation of pressure profiles and makes use of a tabular format for the input of relative permeability and capillary pressure values instead of the use of polynomial functions.