Abstract

Adding new wells and new production in existing fields under EOR is particularly important in matured fields that are characterized by a long history of field activity. Different drilling programs, variety of field treatments, well conversions, and new injectors add many layers of complexity and uncertainty on top of the existing effects of geological, completion, and production factors.

Surveillance and prediction of responses caused by injected fluids, in fields with dozens of patterns and hundreds of wells, calls for computer-based systems that estimate responses based on numerical and statistical solutions. This is especially important when geological understanding is very weak (no core, no log data).

This paper shows how results from EOR surveillance programs can be integrated with geological data. Furthermore, this paper shows how to build predictive models for production estimates, based on injection responses and geology. These models support a two to three times more accurate selection of wells with high oil production during EOR than historically implemented selections.

Included in the paper are practical tips on how to select the best model and derive solutions with decision trees that are equivalent to sets of English based rules. Solutions from decision trees are compared with solutions from logistic regression and neural networks. This comparison deals with the statistical accuracy of model predictions, interpretation ability, and assisting in applying these models to support field decisions.

Introduction

Our main goal was to develop and test a model that would predict production performance during waterfloods. In predictive modeling, regression is traditionally applied to predict continuos target variables1. Models that predict binary response variables use logistic regression2. A binary target variable is characterized by two events. They can be of numerical nature (0 and 1), where zero represents a non-event and one represents an event. Alternatively, a character string with two outcomes (e.g. No and Yes) is often applied.

In the case of a continuos target variable, we may predict the fluid rates of oil, water, gas, or the total fluids. The binary 0/1-target variable can represent a low or high production output respectively. A production cut-off can be based on economical or engineering criteria applied to the actual rates or volumes in a specific time period.

This paper presents the principles of a numerical model development for predicting well performance during waterfood in the Pekisko B. field. The production performance predictions were based on geological and injection response parameters. The injection response parameter definition and non-numerical integration with geological data was recently presented in the JCPT Journal (June 2001) 3.

In this paper, the performance predictions were done for a binary target variable that identified wells with good performance. The performance was based on the actual normalized volume of production. A well's normalized production was defined as a ratio of the well production, in a specific time period, to the total field production in the same time period. A binary target variable (indicator) of two levels (0 and 1) was assigned based on the normalized production.

This content is only available via PDF.
You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.