The small GOR commonly measured in SAGD projects has not previously been adequately explained, and various phenomena such as "microfingering" have been proposed to account for its presence.

It is shown that the production of gases can be entirely explained by gases dissolved in the produced fluids at the temperature and pressure conditions of the SAGD steam chamber. Although methane is produced in part via bitumen, there is a significant contribution from methane dissolved in water as well. Other gases, such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulphide, are primarily produced by virtue of their solubility in water at the pertaining temperature and pressure.

This result is a consequence of the asymptotic Henry's Law behaviour of gases in water as the critical point of water is approached. This asymptotic behaviour is shown to govern at temperatures well below the critical point, and within the temperature range of SAGD steam zones. The theoretical foundation of this work permits the estimation of gas-water equilibrium constsnts for the major produced gases of importance in SAGD, and thus an ultimate understanding of gas effects in the steam zone.


The production of hydrogen sulphide and carbon dioxide together with other minor gases in thermal recovery projects such as Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage is a common observation. The process giving rise to these gases is a high temperature hydrolysis of aliphatic sulphur linkages in the bitumen, dubbed "aquathermolysis" by Hyne et. al.1,2,3 Typically, the amount of hydrogen sulphide produced per tonne of bitumen varies between 6 and 75 litres. Considerably more carbon dioxide is produced, usually in the range 900-10,000 litres per tonne. However, Hyne and coworkers have not dealt with the question of whether steam or steam condensate effects these reactions, and their experiments permit no conclusions in this regard.

In some of our own experiments, the procedure of Hyne et. al. was changed in that a stainless steel reaction vessel was used. In order to avoid loss of hydrogen sulphide to the steel, it was necessary to suppress the hydrogen sulphide in the gas phase. The experiment was arranged such that the reaction vessel was completely filled to eliminate a headspace, and an overpressure of 50,000 kPa was applied by means of helium gas. Thus, while Hyne's experiments at 240 °C were conducted at the steam saturation pressure of approximately 3500 kPa, in our case a gas phase was effectively prevented from forming. Our results were within the range reported by Hyne, suggesting strongly that the steam condensate rather than steam itself is the reagent in the aquathermolysis.

The question thus arises about the location within the steam zone where this reaction occurs. Elementary considerations of chemical kinetics would suggest that the steam front and the fluid drainage zone are the only regions of the SAGD steam chamber where the reaction is possible, these being the only regions where both steam condensate and bitumen are present in high saturations.

This content is only available via PDF.
You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.