This paper describes recent developments in techniques for the reassessment, maintenance and repair of offshore steel structures. Techniques discussed include refined modelling of tubular joints to incorporate local joint flexibilities and use of test data to describe tubular joint strengths and Stress Concentration Factors. These techniques are adopted to obtain better estimates of safety margins; these safety levels are discussed with respect to those implied by design codes such as API RP2A. Different repair techniques are discussed and evaluated including 'wet' and 'dry' (habitat for example) welding, grouted sleeves, mechanical clamps and stressed grouted clamps. The use of these techniques are illustrated by examples. The scope of the background research 1lSed to justify the increasingly popular grouted repair techniques is described.
The reassessment, maintenance and repair of existing offshore installations is now an important part of offshore engineering. Design codes provide little or no guidance in this area. The techniques discussed in this paper provide a rational structural reappraisal and identify the extent of maintenance, inspection and the need to repair. This rationale is important if unnecessary and costly strengthening or repair is to be avoided. The alternative repair techniques discussed in this paper will assist in selecting the most economic solution whilst maintaining the desired safety margins.
This paper is concerned with the reassessment and repair and strengthening of fixed tubular steel offshore structures. The paper has been divided into two parts:
A - Reassessment of jacket structures
B - Recent developments in repair methods
The major development in repair methods discussed in Part B is the increasing use of mechanical and grouted repair systems as an alternative to welded repairs. The background to these systems and the basic research studies are outlined. Some examples of the forty major repairs using these techniques are given.
The engineering reassessment of an offshore platform may be initiated for one or more of several reasons including:
Routine updating of platform operating basis (e.g. revised deck loading)
Changes in design codes/design premise
Investigation of the effects of potential damage
Planning of rational inspection programmes
Recertification.
During the detail design stage for a major structure it is usually only possible to consider a limited number of loading scenarios.