Summary

Two of the most important parameters to monitor during a primary cementing job are the flow rate in and return flow rate measurements. To achieve optimum job results of a primary cementing job, measuring annular return rates and comparing them with simulated data in real time will provide a better understanding of job signatures and result in the best possible top of cement (TOC) estimation prior to running any cement evaluation log or making a decision to continue drilling the next section of the well.

The return rate job signature along with the wellhead pressure is essential to understanding the behavior and discrepancies between simulated and acquired surface data. Therefore, to assess the risk of job issues, such as unsuspected washout and lost circulation among others, accurate measurements of the return rate are critical.

Historically, the cement job evaluation has been limited by the fact that most drilling rigs do not have an accurate flowmeter installed on the annulus return line, and a simple verification of mud tanks volume vs. pumped volume, as reported by drillers or mud loggers, more often than not results in an unreliable assessment of the volume lost downhole, due to the unfamiliarity with the U-tubing effect and lack of data consolidation from the cement unit (flow rate in) and the rig (flow rate in and flow rate out).

In this paper, we will review a solution developed to mitigate the lack of a direct flow-rate measurement by computing and displaying the return rate using either a paddle meter measurement or the derivative over time of the volume observed in the rig tanks.

You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.