ABSTRACT:

The evolution of surface subsidence is an important focus of study above Molycorp, Inc.?s newest block cave at the Questa molybdenum mine near Taos, New Mexico. The case study compares mature glory hole subsidence over the Goathill Orebody and subsidence emerging in its earliest stage over the new D Orebody block cave. Subsidence above the D Orebody was first detected in April 2003, 30 months after caving was initiated. Caving propagated to surface through 550 m of overburden at an average rate of 0.21 m per day. At the end of 2004, an average of 100 m of draw over a 1.4-hectare (ha) block produced a near- circular subsidence basin 5.8 m deep at its center and 90 m offset from the center of the block. Observations to date indicate a cave ratio of 10:1 and a gross cave bulking factor on the order of 10%. Historically, cave-angle projection models have been used to predict subsidence extents for reclamation planning. In light of evolving regulatory concerns, efforts are underway to develop a more accurate subsidence predictor using a three-dimensional (3D) numerical model. Particle Flow Code (PFC3D), a discontinuum ball code, was selected for modeling because of its ability to simulate stress fracturing of the rock mass and large-scale mass flow underground and at the surface, which are believed to be the dominant physical phenomena governing the formation of block cave subsidence. Advances simulating subsidence in the Goathill and D orebodies with PFC3D are discussed.

INTRODUCTION

The Molycorp, Inc. (Molycorp), Questa block caving mine is located near the northern New Mexico town of Questa, as shown in Figure 1. Molybdenum has been mined at Questa for over 80 years. Molycorp began large-scale open pit mining in 1965, but by the mid-1970s, plans for underground mining were developed to combat high stripping ratios. By the end of 1976, a substantial high-grade deposit was delineated by exploratory drilling southwest of the open pit. The block caving method was selected because of the well-fractured nature of the rock mass, and the size and shape of the deposit [1]. Figure 2 shows the general layout of the current underground mine and the two main block caves: (1) the 300-m-deep Goathill Orebody and (2) the 600- to 800-m-deep D Orebody.

This content is only available via PDF.
You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.